|
VIETNAM
REVIEW
News
Commentary
Research
paper
For
the U.S. Congress - Professional Staff and Legislative Assistants for
Foreign Policies and Concerned
Citizens
November
- December, 2004
1.
Vietnam Refuses Military Alliance Foreign Bases: Says White Paper
02
2.
International Donors Optimistic About Vietnam
03
3.
Vietnam Committee On Human Rights Protests Vietnams Denial
Of
Visa To U.S. Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez
04
4. Letter to President Bush on new
CPCs from 6 U.S. Senators.
06
5.
U.S. Ambassador Queries Vietnams Treatment Of Buddhist Dissidents
07
6. China Rejects Groundless
Vietnamese Allegations On Oil Drilling
08
7. Police Prevent Monks From
Visiting Sick Dissident In Vietnam
09
8.
U.S. Officials Meet Monks From Banned Vietnam Buddhist Church Associated
Press 09
9.
Vietnam Jails 17 Montagnards For Undermining National Security During
Easter Protest 10
10.
Pope Deplores Lack Of Religious Freedom In Asian Countries
11
11.
Narcotic Prostitution Evils Rampant Across Vietnam
11
12.
New Religious Ordinance In Vietnam Greeted With Skepticism
12
13. Police stops young Buddhists
from going on pilgrimage
13
14. U.N.
Says Discrimination Against Vietnamese With AIDS Among World's Worst
14
15. U.N.
Says It Is Unable To Help Vietnamese Hill People Reclaim Confiscated Lands
15
16. Vietnam,
U.S. Negotiate WTO Accession
16
17. Buddhist
Youth Leaders Are Prevented From Leaving Vietnam
17
18. IT:
Vietnam Internet Access, RSF Report
19
19. Third Annual Worldwide Press
Freedom Index
22
20. Vietnam
Attack on Mennonites Highlights Religious Persecution
23
21. Father
Chan Tins Letter to Ambassador John V. Hanford
25
22.
Accustomed to corruption
26
23. The
Crossroads: The Drive For Change
29
24. American
Legion National Commander Calls For Senate Vote On Vietnam
Human
Rights
Act Of 2004
31
25.
Survival Of Former U.S. Allies Depends On Vietnam Human Rights Act Of 2004
32
26. Ambassador's
Speech To The American Chamber Of Commerce In Hanoi
34
Vietnamese
American Concerned Citizens (VACC)
P.O. Box 59655,
Potomac. MD 20859
VietnamReview2004@yahoo.com
Contact: Khai Q.
Nguyen
Vietnam
Refuses Military Alliance Foreign Bases: Says White Paper
Global
News Wire - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire
Copyright
2004 Toan Viet Limited Co
Vietnam
News Briefs
December
10, 2004
Vietnam
will never join any military alliance nor allow any foreign country to set
up military bases in the country, accordingly to a recent White Paper
released by the Ministry of Defense.
The
paper, the second published since 1998, was introduced by Deputy Minister,
Senior Lieutenant General Nguyen Huy Hieu, at a press briefing held
yesterday in Hanoi.
The
paper, which will define Vietnam's policies of national defense for the
early years of the new millennium, states that the nation will never take
part in any military activity that uses forces or threatens to use force
against any other nation.
The
country will not be embroiled in an arms race as its prime interests are
peace and self-defense. It, however, needs to build a national defense
force strong enough to overcome any attempts to subvert or exploit it.
"Vietnam
applies all necessary measures to achieve our goal of national defense,
while still respecting the independence, sovereignty and interests of
other nations according to the United Nations' Chapters and international
laws," the paper says.
"In
regard to the disputes of territorial sovereignty on land and in the sea,
bequeathed by history or newly emergent, Vietnam is willing to take part
in peaceful negotiation to find reasonable solutions."
The
White Paper, however, reiterates the nation's firm policies on disputes of
sovereignty in the South China Sea.
Vietnam
has sufficient historical evidence and a legal basis to assert its
indisputable sovereignty over the territorial waters and islands in the
South China Sea among them the Paracels and Spratlys, it said. The country
is ready to settle the problem through peaceful negotiations for the
common security of the concerned parties, it confirmed.
The
White Paper also pledges that Vietnam will cooperate with other nations in
efforts to solve non-traditional security issues such as transnational
organized crime, illegal drug trafficking, and piracy to ensure
sustainable development in Vietnam and abroad.
According
to unofficial statistics, Vietnam sets aside 2.5% of annual gross domestic
product (GDP) on national defense.
Vietnam's
army currently employs 412,000 people (estimated) in 45 main battle tanks,
according to IISS's Military Balance 2003/2004. The navy has 42,000 forces
(estimated) with two submarines, six frigates, 42 patrol and coastal
combat vessels and 10 mine countermeasures. The air force has 30,000
militants with 189 combat aircraft and 26 armed helicopters.
The
country with an 81-million population also has an estimated 484,000 people
in other armed forces, including 40,000 people in paramilitary units such
as border defense corps and coast guards, and another 3-4 million reserves.
International
Donors Optimistic About Vietnam
Asia
Pulse
December
6, 2004 Monday
With a
commitment of US$3.44 billion in official development assistance (ODA) for
Vietnam in 2005, international donors once again showed their confidence
in and strong support for Vietnam's policies and development programmes.
A year
ago when the 2003 Consultative Group (CG) Meeting for Vietnam closed, both
Vietnamese and the foreign press were surprised at the donors' commitment
of US$2.84 billion for Vietnam, an increase of US $0.3 billion over the
previous year, as ODA commitments declined in the world.
At the
threshold of this year's meeting, ODA figures were predicted to be the
same as last year.
Maintaining
the level of US$2.84 billion is Vietnam's desire because the country is
facing challenges in policy institution and competitiveness when its
economy is in a hurry to shift to a market economy and integrate into the
world economy.
Furthermore,
many people worry about Vietnam's poor economic competition as classified
by the international economic forum.
A
number of leaders from the government and donors spoke at forums and told
the press about this issue. Most of them said the assessment was based on
small surveys and does not reflect Vietnam's general situation.
In the
past years, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the World
Bank (WB), and the International Financial Corporation (IFC), said without
hesitation that Vietnam has progressed and expressed their belief in
Vietnam's renewal success.
Klaus
Rohland said the WB, the main coordinator of Vietnam's aid, was confident
Vietnam will complete its shift to a market economy by 2010.
This
year's CG meeting concluded with a record ODA commitment, much larger than
expected.
The
commitment was made based on the donors' unanimity that Vietnam has made
steady and large economic growth over the past few years and that this
momentum will be maintained in the coming years. The stability in
macro-economic policy as well as inflation controls and the increases in
foreign exchange reserves, the balance of payment and the current account
have impressed the donor community. Investment for development made up 38
percent of GDP, which Rohland considered much higher than other countries.
Above
all, the appropriateness and efficiency in the use of the ODA funding for
development and poverty reduction are another reason explaining the
increase.
The
WB, IFC and IMF were all satisfied with the pace of disbursement of ODA in
Vietnam, which has seen much improvement.
The
ODA funding has helped improve infrastructure, boost agricultural and
rural development, benefited poor people, and contributed to improving
human development indexes.
Vietnam's
efforts in procedure harmonisation were recognised by the donors. Vietnam
is the first country to bring this issue up for discussion at the CG
meeting. In addition, Government Decree 17 on the management and use of
ODA funds is being modified to meet the new requirements of donors and is
expected to bring about higher efficiency in the use of ODA funds.
The
domination of anti-corruption and wastefulness at domestic meetings and
the delegation of more power to inspecting agencies have reaffirmed the
Vietnamese government's efforts in these areas.
The
fact that Vietnam is racing against time to accede to the WTO is opening
bright prospects for foreign businesses in Vietnam. The closer Vietnam
gets to the doors of WTO, the stronger its legislation is adjusted to meet
the WTO's demands so as to move towards to a unified, transparent and fair
legal framework for all economic sectors.
A
report at the Vietnam business forum showed that nearly 84 percent of 195
surveyed businesses wanted to expand investment in Vietnam as Vietnam has
bright prospects, a stable political environment, a large potential market
and reasonable policies on foreign exchange. A recent statistic by the
Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) said that Japan -
Vietnam's largest donor of ODA, ranks Vietnam its fourth nation among ten
foreign countries to receive investment by Japanese businesses.
Donors
such as the WB, IMF, IFC, JBIC, and UNDP all agreed that the Vietnamese
Government always pays heed to on opinions from domestic and foreign
businesses and partners, then gives out positive, clear and effective
solutions. This has become a tradition and advantage that Vietnam would
continue to develop in the future.
Increasing
capital after each conference brought both materials for highways, bridges
and factories, and a spiritual present from the donors to the Vietnamese
Government and people, encouraging Vietnam on the way of national
development, said Deputy Prime Minister Vu Khoan.
Exceeding
the success of those figures was a consensus reached by the government and
donors at the CG Meeting on Vietnam's achievements and challenges at
present and in the coming years.
Vietnam's
challenges are more sustainable growth, stronger administrative reform,
stricter anti-corruption, narrowing the development gap and more concerns
to sensitive portions of population as Vietnam joins the WTO.
Vietnam
Committee On Human Rights Protests Vietnams Denial Of Visa To U.S.
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez
Quj Me : Action for Democracy in
Vietnam / Quj Me : Action pour la Dimocratie au Vietnam
Vietnam Committee on Human Rights /
Comiti Vietnam pour la Difense des Droits de l'Homme
BP 63 - 94472 Boissy Saint Liger
cedex France
Tel : +33 1 45 98 30 85 - Fax :
+33 1 45 98 32 61
For immediate release
Paris, 8th December 2004
Vietnam
Committee on Human Rights protests Vietnam's denial of visa to US
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez
The
Vietnam Committee on Human Rights strongly condemns Vietnam's refusal to
grant a visa to US Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez to visit Vietnam.
Congresswoman Sanchez, a Democrat who represents "Little Saigon"
in Santa Ana (California), the largest Vietnamese community in the United
States, and who is currently in Thailand on a leg of a visit to South-East
Asia, received a letter via the US Embassy in Hanoi from the External
Relations Office of Vietnam's National Assembly on 3rd December stating
that her visa application was rejected because she "altogether lacks
objectivity and goodwill toward Vietnam".
"For
Vietnam's leaders, the only people with "objectivity and goodwill"
are those who shower praise and US dollars on the regime", said Vo
Van Ai, President of the Paris-based Vietnam Committee on Human Rights.
"By turning down Rep. Sanchez's visit, they are closing the door on a
friend of Vietnam who comes simply to help those who suffer injustice and
discrimination because of their peaceful religious or political
convictions. Vietnam should stop dividing the world into friends and
enemies, and take heed of the sincere appeals of its citizens and
international friends who encourage the regime to take the path of
political reform".
Congresswoman
Sanchez has made two previous visits to Vietnam, in 1999 and 2000, when
she accompanied President Bill Clinton on the first ever visit by a US
President to Vietnam since the end of the Vietnam war. During both trips,
she met with dissidents, including Venerable Thich Quang Do, Deputy leader
of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV). One of the most vocal
critics of Vietnam's human rights record in the US House of
Representatives, she strongly supported the Vietnam Human Rights Act,
which linked US-Vietnam bilateral trade relations to concrete improvements
in human rights, and has introduced extensive legislation to promote
democracy, human rights and religious freedom in Vietnam. In November
2003, she sponsored House Res. 427 condemning Vietnam's crackdown on the
outlawed Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam and calling for the release of
UBCV leaders.
At the
same time as Congressman Sanchez is prohibited from visiting Vietnam,
Vietnam has sent its top diplomatic lobbyist, Ms Ton Nu Thi Ninh,
Vice-Director of the Vietnamese National Assembly's Foreign Affairs
Committee, on a visit to the US to "promote Vietnam-US
relations". Commenting on the refusal of Rep. Sanchez's visit, Ms
Ninh said: "Sanchez has never shown any constructive objectivity or
any real interest in moving the bilateral relations forward in both of her
two visits to Vietnam as well as in her subsequent deeds and statements.
Regrettably, we can only conclude that thus far, such a visit will not
serve any useful purpose for Vietnam or for Vietnam-US relations."
Ms
Ninh, who spoke in New York on Tuesday and will speak at the National
Press Club in Washington D.C. on Thursday, has actively lobbied against
legislation such as the Vietnam Human Rights Act, and opposes all
criticism of Vietnam's human rights record. A staunch defender of the
Communist Party's political monopoly, she recently declared at the
Asia-Europe Fifth People's Forum in Hanoi in September 2004 - where the
international press was banned from covering the event - that Vietnam's
aim was to "build democracy within a one-party system". "We
must defend the right of minorities", she said, attempting to justify
the "right" of the 2.6 million minority of Vietnamese Communist
Party members to exercise authoritarian control over the majority of 81
million people in Vietnam.
U.S.
Ambassador Queries Vietnams Treatment Of Buddhist Dissidents
Deutsche
Presse-Agentur
November
26, 2004, Friday
The
Unites States ambassador to Vietnam expressed his concern Friday at
Vietnam's treatment of two high-profile Buddhist dissidents.
The
leaders of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV) have been under
de facto house arrest, since a run-in with communist authorities last
October, according to the International Buddhist Information Bureau (IBIB),
the information arm of the UBCV.
This
week Thich Quang Do, the deputy leader of the organization, was prevented
from visiting patriarch Thich Huyen Quang, who was hospitalized last week.
"We
are aware of the fact that his (Thich Huyen Quang's) deputy Thich Quang Do
has not been allowed to visit him," Ambassador Michael W. Marine told
reporters. "We have made it clear in various conversations that this
is very hard to understand."
Ambassador
Marine had a brief meeting with 87-year-old leader of the UBCV earlier
this week, he said.
Over a
year ago, immediately following the run-in with authorities, Vietnam's
press spokesman said the pair would face charges of "carrying state
secrets," but since then no official charges have been made, the IBIB
said Friday.
"Were
the government to press charges, we would call for transparency in the
process so that we and others can understand what the charges are all
about and so that these individuals can receive whatever legal protections
are possible under Vietnamese law," Ambassador Marine said.
Le
Dung, Vietnam's press spokesman, failed to respond when asked by fax over
a week ago whether the men would be facing charges.
The
UBCV is not recognized by the communist government, and the two leaders
have spent most of the last 20 years either in prison or under house
arrest.
During
Marine's first two months as ambassador, one issue that has come up with
Vietnamese officials, is the U.S. State Department decision in September
to designate Vietnam as a "country of particular concern" (CPC)
for its record on religious freedom.
"The
Vietnamese unhappiness and disagreement with our decision to designate
them a CPC certainly comes up, but that's usually part of the dialogue as
to why that decision was made and what steps could be taken by Vietnam to
cause us to reverse that decision," Ambassador Marine said.
A
range of punitive measures could be applied to Vietnam as a result of the
state department ruling, but these measures have yet to be decided, the
ambassador said.
Despite
differences over religious freedom and human rights, trade relations
between the former foes continue to develop and will be a significant part
of the new ambassador's work, he said.
"U.S.
business is not yet here in the way I would like to see it here,"
Ambassador Marine said. "I would like to see more opportunity and I
would like to convince Vietnamese officials and business entities to 'think
American' more than they do now."
Following
the signing of a Bilateral Trade Agreement between the two countries in
2001, the U.S. has become Vietnam's biggest trading partner.
Earlier
this year, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled that Vietnam had
been "dumping" - selling catfish on the U.S. market at unfairly
low prices. Next month a similar ruling on Vietnamese shrimp is expected.
Despite
these hiccups in trade relations, the U.S. fully backed Vietnam's wishes
to join the World Trade Organization as soon as possible, the ambassador
told foreign and Vietnamese journalists.
Full
diplomatic relations were only re-established between the two countries
just under a decade ago, and there was room for improvement in relations,
the ambassador said. dpa st jh
China Rejects Groundless
Vietnamese Allegations On Oil Drilling
BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific
Political
Supplied by BBC Worldwide
Monitoring
November 23, 2004, Tuesday
SOURCE: Xinhua news agency,
Beijing, in English 1443 gmt 23 Nov 04
Text of report in English by
official Chinese news agency Xinhua (New China News Agency)
Beijing,
23 November: China rejected Vietnam's request to halt oil exploration in a
boundary sea area, but is willing to keep communication with Vietnam on
the issue. China is conducting normal and regular oil exploration
operations in the Chinese area of Beibu Bay, neighbouring south China and
north Vietnam. Vietnam's accusation is "groundless", Foreign
Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue said when asked to comment on the report.
China's
drilling platform "Exploration No 3" is conducting regular
exploration in China's territorial waters, Zhang told a regular press
conference. Relevant maritime department of China has published notice of
sailing to ships passing the area according to international safety
practice, she said. The accusation based on Vietnam's unilateral position
is "groundless" and "unacceptable" to China, she said.
China is willing to maintain dialogue and communications with the
Vietnamese side on this issue.
Police Prevent Monks From
Visiting Sick Dissident In Vietnam
Deutsche Presse-Agentur
November 22, 2004, Monday
Dissident
monk Thich Quang Do said police on Monday blocked the car he was riding in
so he could not visit Thich Huyen Quang, the 87-year-old patriarch of the
banned Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV), in hospital.
The
Buddhist leader was admitted to hospital with kidney problems, a heart
complaint and pneumonia last week. U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam Michael
Marine paid a visit to the ailing leader on Sunday.
Thich
Quang Do, the UBCV deputy met with U.S. officials on Sunday, including the
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Dugan.
Speaking
by telephone en route to Ho Chi Minh City, Do said the group of monks had
been turned back by authorities while traveling to see their ailing leader
and were then followed by four vehicles.
"They
gave us no reason we were compelled to return (although) we asked for
reason, they refused to answer," he said. He said he believed they
may be taken into custody when they arrive in Ho Chi Minh City.
Authorities
placed Thich Huyen Quang under de facto house arrest last October after
he, Thich Quang Do and other leaders of the group held a meeting. The two
most senior UBVC figures have not spoken for a year, Do said.
Quang
was permitted to leave his monastery last Thursday for treatment. Doctors
at the hospital said his condition had improved since last week. He is
still in the emergency ward but getting better now, said Tran Van Trung,
of the Binh Dinh General Hospital, 680 kilometres north of Ho Chi Minh
City.
He can
now sit up and eat a little, which was almost impossible when he was first
admitted to the hospital. He can also talk a bit now, Trung said.
The
UBVC is frowned upon by the Vietnamese government and both Do and Quang
have spent much of the last 20 years either in prison or under house
arrest. dpa bb blg
U.S.
Officials Meet Monks From Banned Vietnam Buddhist Church Associated Press
November
22, 2004 Monday 2:56 AM Eastern Time
U.S.
diplomats met with leaders of an outlawed Buddhist church in Vietnam over
the weekend, the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi said Monday.
It was
the first diplomatic visit Vietnam's government has allowed the Unified
Buddhist Church of Vietnam's deputy leader, Thich Quang Do, in more than a
year, the Paris-based Buddhist Information Bureau said in a statement.
U.S.
Consul General Seth Winnick and Elizabeth Dugan of the U.S. State
Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor and met with Do
on Sunday in Ho Chi Minh City to discuss the church's plight, the
statement said.
The
U.S. Embassy confirmed the visit and said U.S. Ambassador Michael Marine
also met on Sunday with church patriarch Thich Huyen Quang, 87, who's in
intensive care at a central Vietnam hospital after a stomach hemorrhage.
No details of the meetings were released.
Do had
also planned to visit Quang in the hospital, but police allegedly stopped
a minivan on its way to pick Do up Monday morning, and the nine monks
inside were told the vehicle was being impounded, the bureau said.
The
monks reportedly began a sit-in around the vehicle, it said.
Vietnamese
officials did not immediately respond to the allegations, but have
repeatedly said that both Do and Quang are not under any type of
government detention.
The
two sides have clashed for years because the church refuses to merge with
one of a handful of state-sanctioned religions.
Do and
Quang have spent more than 20 years each under house arrest, and have been
under surveillance since October 2003 after church members met to elect
new leaders, the Paris-based bureau said.
Vietnam's
human rights record has been internationally criticized. In September, the
U.S. State Department listed it as one of the world's worst countries for
religious repression - a designation that could result in economic
sanctions if the situation does not improve.
Vietnam
Jails 17 Montagnards For Undermining National Security During Easter
Protest
Associated
Press
November
22, 2004 Monday 12:25 AM Eastern Time
A
court in Vietnam's restive Central Highlands has sentenced 17 hill tribe
people up to 10 years in jail for undermining national security and unity
during an Easter weekend protest, an official said Monday.
In
three separate trials in Dak Nong province last week, the provincial
People's Court handed down jail terms from three to 10 years for members
of the Ede ethnic minority group, the court official said on condition of
anonymity.
They
were convicted of forcing ethnic minority people, collectively called
Montagnards, to flee to neighboring Cambodia, luring people to join
protests causing national security and public disorder, and distorting the
policies of the Communist Party and government, he said.
Tens
of thousands of hill tribe people took to the streets in Daklak, Dak Nong
and Gia Lai provinces over Easter weekend to protest government
restrictions on their Protestant Christian faith and confiscation of their
ancestral lands.
International
human rights groups claimed 10 protesters were killed in clashes with
police, but Hanoi said only two died after being pelted with rocks thrown
by other protesters.
At
least a dozen Montagnards have been jailed in Daklak and Gia Lai provinces
for their involvement in the protests. More than 500 who fled to Cambodia
have been put under U.N. refugee protection, but several have opted to
return to Vietnam, saying they're homesick.
Many
Montagnards served as U.S. allies during the Vietnam War and a number were
resettled in the United States after the war ended in 1975.
Pope
Deplores Lack Of Religious Freedom In Asian Countries
Agence
France Presse English
November
19, 2004 Friday 2:12 PM GMT
Pope
John Paul II on Friday deplored the lack of religious freedom in some
Asian countries, where he said Christians were not free to "profess
their faith", but stopped short of identifying the states involved.
The
pontiff was speaking to a council of Asian bishops which convened at the
Vatican as part of an ongoing series of meetings to discuss a previous
synod.
"Those
who suffer especially are those who are not free to profess their faith,"
said the pope, adding that these Christians should continue to be "silent
witnesses" of Christ, "in patient waiting for the day in which
they will have full religious liberty".
The
84-year-old pope did not mention any country by name, but it is clear that
he had China and Vietnam in mind, both countries with which he has waged a
long battle over their refusal to recognize his primacy over Catholics
there.
The
Vatican accused China in September of serious human rights violations for
unfairly arresting a number of Roman Catholic priests in the country.
The
Catholic church in China is divided. One branch, known as "The Church
of Silence," is clandestine, loyal to the Vatican and thought to have
several million followers.
The
other has pledged allegiance to the Chinese authorities. Known as the
"patriotic" church, it has about four million members and does
not recognise the authority of the pope.
Vietnam's
communist authorities allow private worship but maintain tight control
over Church activities.
Church
appointments have to be submitted for government approval and the training
of priests and construction of churches are tightly controlled.
John
Paul II told the bishops the fact that the Roman Catholic Church in Asia
"is 'a little flock' should not lead to discouragement, because the
effectiveness of evangelization does not depend on numbers", pointing
out that Christ began the process of evangelization with only a few
apostles.
The
pope added that Asia's high percentage of young people represented "a
reason for optimism for the future and a challenge for the present".
"A
reason for optimism because the young generations, full of promise, are
available to dedicate themselves totally to a cause; a challenge because
unrealised dreams can generate disillusionment, and those who cultivate
them can easily take advantage of them to promote extreme ideologies."
Narcotic
Prostitution Evils Rampant Across Vietnam
Global
News Wire - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire
Copyright
2004 Toan Viet Limited Co
Vietnam
News Briefs
November
19, 2004
As
many as 54% of communes and wards nationwide in Vietnam are suffering from
serious social evils of narcotics and prostitution, according to figures
released from a national conference on social evil prevention ongoing in
Hanoi.
Twenty-nine
out of 34 reviewed cities and provinces report an increase in the number
of drug addicts while only five localities saw a fall, the conference was
told.
A
similar picture regarding prostitution was also announced with a hike in
21 cities and provinces.
Particularly,
reports from the conference calculated up to more than 1,000 communes and
wards seeing an increasingly severe situation, where drugs are used,
traded and transported in a rush and prostitution is widespread at
well-and closed-operated public and entertainment facilities including
hotels, guesthouses, cafes, karaoke parlors, massage centers and
hair-dressing shops.
According
to Deputy Minister of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs Dam Huu Dac,
several localities have focussed only on sweeping addicts and prostitutes
away from fields to gain recognition but have not paid adequate attention
to managing and helping the rehabilitated people, leading to a high rate
of relapse.
Mr.
Dac also noted that the target of 70% of communes and wards free of the
evils by 2010 will become a infeasible figure unless serious
considerations and effective measures are applied.
"The
most important thing is consultation," he said, explaining that good
consulting works will help those citizens raise determination to give up
habits and integrate into communities.
A part
from the propaganda and control, other works related to strengthening
personnel machinery and improving policy mechanism are also be enhanced,
Dac said.
(Great
Unity Nov 19 p6, The Law Nov 19 p2)
New
Religious Ordinance In Vietnam Greeted With Skepticism
Deutsche
Presse-Agentur
November
15, 2004, Monday
Vietnam's
first ever ordinance on religion came into effect Monday, and was greeted
with skepticism by some religious leaders.
"After
reading the whole ordinance I think that we are still under the control of
the government," said a Catholic bishop from southern Vietnam who
requested anonymity.
Vietnam
frequently faces international criticism relating to its poor record on
religious freedom. Earlier this year, the communist country was placed on
a U.S. State Department list of "countries of particular concern"
in relation to the lack of religious freedom.
Although
Catholic worshippers - who after Buddhists are the second biggest
religious group in the country - are not prevented from attending church,
the ordinance means that it is under government control.
"Every
new religious activity we want to do, we will have to get permission from
the government. For example if we want to build a new church, we have to
get permission," the bishop said. "We will wait and see how it
is implemented."
Another
Catholic leader in Vietnam went further in his condemnation of the new
ordinance, according to the Catholic news website Asia News.
"We
do not have the right to organize ourselves as we see fit and must seek
authorization for every choice and decision. This means there is no full
religious freedom," Archbishop Nguyen Nhu The, from the central city
of Hue, told Asia News recently.
Around
20 per cent of Vietnam's 81 million people are religious, according to the
governments religion office.
Buddhists
are most numerous in Vietnam, with around 9.3 million people, Catholics
are next with 5.3 million worshippers and there are just under 500,000
Protestants, the religion office said.
Although
the new ordinance states that religious discrimination is not permitted
and that all citizens have the right to follow whichever religion they
choose, parts of the new regulation mean that anything deemed to disturb
national security and unity, can be punished.
Rights
groups have criticized the ordinance, saying that it tightens and
increases the government's grip on religion, in one of the last five
communist countries in the world.
"Its
(the ordnance) first article, quoting Vietnam's Constitution, pays lip
service to freedom of religion, but most of the remaining articles
restrict that freedom and expand government controls over religion. The
Ordinance also bans religious activities based on vague standards of
national security," Human Rights Watch said in a statement in
September.
Police stops young Buddhists
from going on pilgrimage
Ho
Chi Mink City (AsiaNews/Edam), November 11, 2004
Vietnamese
authorities stopped and interrogated members of the Vietnamese Buddhist
youth movement The Family who were on their way to India on a
pilgrimage. National security was given as the reason. They had agreed to
meet in early November at Ho Chi Minh Citys International Airport and
then go on a pilgrimage to the places where Buddhism was born.
As
they prepared to board their flight, they found that their names were on a
list of people not allowed to leave the country. After police
interrogation at the airport, they were released and handed a note stating
that they were stopped for national security reasons.
The
trip had been planned a year in advance and the participants had filled
out all the necessary procedures to obtain both passport and visa.
Why
the police deemed the trip a danger to national security remains
a mystery. It might however fall under the new Ordinance on Beliefs and
Religions law which guarantees freedom of worship but under the
control of the state.
The
incident caused commotion in Vietnams Buddhist community. The young
pilgrims wanted to visit Buddhisms holiest sites in India and take
part in the World Movement of Vietnamese Buddhist Youth. They
were also supposed to meet other movement members living abroad. An
estimated 20,000 are in fact settled outside Vietnam.
The
congress took place in Bodhgaya (India) and was attended by members from
the US, Canada, Europe and Australia.
At the
end of the proceedings, participants adopted a double resolution. In the
first part, they deplored the absence of delegates from Vietnam. The
travel ban shows the authorities have contempt for their own laws and
international rules. In the second part, they asserted the support of
young Buddhists to religious freedom and backed their demand for official
recognition.
U.N.
Says Discrimination Against Vietnamese With AIDS Among World's Worst
AIDS
Weekly & Law
November
11, 2004
Stigma
and discrimination against people living with HIV/AIDS in Vietnam is among
the worst in the world and must be overcome to control the epidemic, a top
United Nations official said October 18, 2004.
After
visiting Ho Chi Minh City, Haiphong and Hanoi, UNAIDS Deputy Executive
Director Kathleen Cravero said if Vietnam does not reverse the way people
think about the disease, it could block attempts to help those infected
with the virus.
"I've
visited over 50 countries and the problem of stigma and discrimination is
as great or greater in Vietnam than in any country I've visited," she
said. "If people fear stigma and discrimination ... they won't seek
testing, they won't seek services, they won't seek any help at all. It
will drive the epidemic underground."
HIV/AIDS
often gets lumped in with Vietnam's so-called "social evils"
policy, which also includes drug use and prostitution. International aid
workers have pushed for the government to stop using the term as one way
to lessen the stigma.
Cravero
said there's still time to fix the problem, and she applauded Vietnam's
comprehensive national strategy as a method of handling the epidemic. The
plan is a long-term approach to dealing with the epidemic, including
prevention and care.
But
she stressed the importance of implementing it quickly, and said people
living with the disease must take a leading role alongside high-ranking
government leaders and organizations.
"All
too often we have national strategies in countries that end up on shelves
as very readable documents that don't mean very much on the ground,"
she said. "Now is the time, in the coming months and the next 2 years,
that Vietnam must take this excellent strategy and make it real for the
people of Vietnam from the very north to the very south."
She
also encouraged the Communist government to create a national AIDS council
with enough political clout to force more people to become actively
involved in attacking the problem.
Vietnam's
infections have largely been contained to high-risk groups such as
intravenous drug users and sex workers, but if left unchecked that rate is
on pace to increase eight-fold to 1 million by 2010.
Vietnam
was one of the 15 countries recently selected to receive emergency funding
from the United States' US$15 billion global AIDS plan to try to prevent
the epidemic from taking off in the general population.
Vietnam
has recorded more than 80,000 HIV-positive cases, of which nearly 13,000
have developed full-blown AIDS and more than 7,000 have died, according to
the Ministry of Health. However, health officials believe the actual
number of HIV-infected people is closer to 200,000.
This
article was prepared by AIDS Weekly & Law & Law editors from staff
and other reports. Copyright 2004, AIDS Weekly & Law & Law via
LawRx.com.
U.N.
Says It Is Unable To Help Vietnamese Hill People Reclaim Confiscated Lands
The
Associated Press
November
5, 2004 Friday 8:02 AM Eastern Time
Byline:
Sam Cage; Associated Press Writer
Dateline:
Geneva
Increasingly
large numbers of Vietnamese hill tribes people are crossing into Cambodia,
mistakenly thinking that the United Nations will help them reclaim
confiscated lands in Vietnam, the global body said Friday.
"It
became apparent during interviews that many of the asylum seekers had
crossed the border following rumors and alleged radio reports that the
'U.N.' could help them recover confiscated lands," said Ron Redmond,
spokesman for the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. "Not all were
fleeing persecution."
Many
members of ethnic minorities - collectively known as Montagnards - have
fled Vietnam's Central Highlands because of religious repression and land
confiscation. More than 1,000 fled in 2001 alone, following a massive
government crackdown on their protests.
But
Cambodia's government has described the Montagnards - mainly members of
Protestant Christian denominations distrusted by Vietnam's communist
government - as economic migrants and is unwilling to accept them as
refugees.
UNHCR
said it has conducted joint operations with the Cambodian government over
the last four months to try to find Montagnards hiding in the jungle in
the border states of Ratannakiri and Mondulkiri.
"A
total of 441 Montagnards presented themselves to UNHCR, and after basic
registration were transported to Phnom Penh for refugee status
determination," Redmond told reporters. "The Cambodian
government has requested the refugees be resettled in a third country
within a short time frame because local integration was not an option."
Once
the refugee agency made it clear that it could not help them recover
confiscated lands, some of the asylum seekers said they wanted to return
to Vietnam, Redmond noted. Others who had been recognized as refugees also
rejected resettlement in a third country.
"Of
some 150 cases submitted for U.S. resettlement, for example, nearly
three-quarters decided against going," Redmond added. Some refugees
told the UNHCR they were being put under pressure to reject resettlement,
but others said their decision was a free choice.
Many
of the refugees were concerned about their families left behind in Vietnam
and the problems they could face if they settled in a new country. Several
asylum seekers have already left UNHCR's offices in Phnom Penh to make
their own way back to Vietnam, Redmond explained.
"This
situation has placed UNHCR in a quandary as our mandate is to provide
international protection for refugees, not to resolve land disputes,"
he said. "We are involved in a constructive dialogue with the
Vietnamese authorities to find an acceptable humanitarian solution for the
repatriation of those asylum seekers who wish to return home.
"But
we nevertheless remain concerned that Montagnards, under the illusion that
we can help with their land problems, may have put themselves at
unnecessary risk and exposed themselves to increased vulnerability by
crossing into Cambodia."
There
are currently 553 Montagnards under UNHCR protection. So far this year, 74
have been resettled in third countries - 67 in the United States and seven
in Sweden.
Vietnam,
U.S. Negotiate WTO Accession
Asia
Pulse
November
5, 2004
Vietnam
made strides in its first official WTO negotiations with the United States,
but more time is needed to bring the two countries together on certain
trade issues, said Vietnamese trade officials.
As
Ministry of Trade negotiators arrived back from the US on Monday, Trade
Minister Truong Dinh Tuyen told the media that while conditions for
Vietnam opening its goods and services markets were the focus of
negotiations, the service sector proved the most contentious issue.
"Negotiations
with the US still involve some complex issues and it is likely we shall
have to undergo several more discussions," said Tuyen.
This
surprised some insiders, since Vietnam just won European Union approval
for its entry into the WTO. The EU is considered a deciding influence for
Vietnam's WTO accession.
"The
expectation was that the finalised deal with the EU would be advantageous
for negotiations with the US," said an unnamed trade ministry
official.
Under
the Vietnam-US Bilateral Trade Agreement, as pointed out by
non-governmental organisation Oxfam International this week, Vietnam had
made concessions to the US beyond WTO requirements.
Sources
close to the US said the two sides have not agreed on a specific date for
the next round of talks.
The
trade ministry said apart from its negotiations with the US, Vietnam had
recently held similar talks with India, South Korea and Paraguay.
Vietnam
is still hoping to join the WTO by 2005, as this is when quotas on garment
and textiles will end for all members of the trade body.
Vietnam's
WTO bid received strong support from countries and international
organisations.
This
week Oxfam International called for an impartial deal for Vietnam at the
WTO as it is being "pressured by rich countries to join the
organisation under conditions that hinder its efforts to reduce poverty."
In its report "Extortion at the Gate: Will Vietnam Join the WTO on
Pro-development Terms?" published on Monday, Oxfam said Vietnam's
accession to the WTO could bring positive gains.
However,
these gains will be undermined if rich countries continue to think only of
self-interest rather than lives of poor people.
Oxfam
said since the early 1990s Vietnam's economy has been growing rapidly as a
result of gradual liberalisation.
The
country has halved its poverty rate from 58 per cent in 1993 to 29 per
cent in 2002.
While
the report noted these figures are impressive, it said Vietnam now faced
the challenge of ensuring its poorest people, the majority of whom make
their living from agriculture, are able to withstand future market shocks.
Oxfam
said further liberalisation must ensure that benefits gained continue to
support small farmers.
WTO
accession should be about giving poor countries a chance said Oxfam, but
noted these nations are forced to do more than rich countries, even if it
harms their development prospects.
"Not
only must an aspirant country such as Vietnam comply with all existing WTO
rules, they must also concede to 'WTO-plus' demands from rich countries in
return for support for their application," said the report.
"The
lack of coherent rules on accession allows individual members to demand
whatever they want."
Steve
Price-Thomas, country representative for Oxfam Great Britain in Vietnam,
said: "This flawed system leaves poor countries like Vietnam with
little bargaining power."
Buddhist
Youth Leaders Are Prevented From Leaving Vietnam
International
Buddhist Information Bureau
(Bureau
International D'information Bouddhiste)
Official
information service of Vien Hoa Dao, Unified Buddhist church of
Vietnam
B.P. 63 - 94472 Boissy Saint Liger cedex (France) - Tel.: Paris
(331)
45 98 30 85 Fax : Paris (331) 45 98 32 61 - E-mail :
ubcv.ibib@buddhist.com
Web : http://www.queme.net/
For
immediate release
Paris,
3 November 2004
Vietnam
prohibits 21 Buddhist Youth leaders from attending the World Movement of
Vietnamese Buddhist Youth Festival in India
The
International Buddhist Information Bureau (IBIB) is informed that 21
leaders of the Vietnamese Buddhist Youth Movement (Gia Dinh Phat Tu Viet
Nam) were intercepted at Tan Son Nhat Airport in Ho Chi Minh City and
banned from leaving Vietnam. The Buddhists, all of whom possessed the
necessary travel documents and visas, were intercepted by Security Police
as they prepared to board flights to India on Monday (November 1st) and
today (November 3rd). Security Police had put up a notice in the airport
with the names of the 21 Buddhist Youth leaders banned from leaving the
country.
The
group was subjected to "working sessions" with Security Police,
and subsequently released. Police simply declared that they were
prohibited from traveling for "national security" reasons, with
no further explanation. According to IBIB sources, Buddhists in Vietnam
are deeply shocked by this unwarranted Police action. The young Buddhists
were traveling to India to make a pilgrimage to Buddhist holy sites and
attend a Festival of the "World Movement of Vietnamese Buddhist Youth"
to be held at Bodhgaya (Bihar) from 8-9 November 2004.
"The
ban is a flagrant violation of the right to freedom of movement enshrined
in the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which
Vietnam is a State party", said IBIB Director Vo Van Ai.
"Vietnam must uphold its international obligations and respect its
citizens' fundamental freedoms and rights".
The
Buddhist Youth Movement, founded over 60 years ago, is an educational
organization based on the "Scouts" movement, which has a current
membership of 300,000 young Buddhists (from 6-18 years) in Vietnam and
20,000 members in the Vietnamese diaspora in the USA, Canada, Europe and
Australia. An affiliate of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV),
the Buddhist Youth Movement was outlawed in 1975 by the Communist
government as part of its campaign to suppress all independent religious
movements. Despite this, it covertly continued its social, educational and
humanitarian activities and its membership increased steadily nationwide.
On
19 February 1995, Buddhist Youth leaders held a Congress in Dalat in an
attempt to legitimize the movement. The authorities reacted by issuing a
"Directive" ordering its immediate disbandment, and directing
the movement to become part of the State-sponsored Vietnam Buddhist
Church. At the same time, the Communist Party instructed its members to
infiltrate the Buddhist Youth Movement and transform it into a section of
the "Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Movement". The authorities were
forced to abandon this plan after young Buddhists protested massively,
with 200 youth leaders pledging to self-immolate if the movement was made
a tool of the Communist Party. Since then, the Buddhist Youth Movement has
effectively pursued its social and educational activities independently of
State control.
The
Buddhist Youth Festival in Bodhgaya would have been the first opportunity
for young members of the Buddhist movement in Vietnam to meet their
counterparts from the Vietnamese Buddhist diaspora.
The
21 Buddhists include leaders of the Buddhist Youth Movement (BYM) Central
Committee and representatives from Thua Thien-Hue, Quang Nam-Danang,
Nhatrang, Dalat, Saigon, i.e. : Nguyen Chau, President, BYM Central
Committee, Le Van San, Secretary General, BYM Central Committee, Phan Dinh
Thang, Internal Affairs Officer, BYM Central Committee, Nguyen Duc Thuong,
Education Officer, BYM Central Committee, Do Thi An, Nguyen Dinh Khoi, Le
Mai, Le Van Loi, Nguyen Thi Nguyet, Ton Nu Ngoc Lan, Nguyen De, Nguyen Thi
My Khanh, Nguyen Hoang Phung, Duong Thi Mai, La Thanh Ty, Nguyen Thi Huong,
Huynh Kim Xao, Buu An, Nguyen Van Coi, Nguyen Thi Phuc and Le Thien Man.
IT:
Vietnam Internet Access, RSF Report
Reporters
without Borders, November 4, 2004
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=10778
Vietnam
Population
: 80,278,000
Internet
users : 2,500,000 (2003)
Average
charge for 20 hours of connection : 15 euros
Digital
access index (DAI)* : 0.31
Situation**
: very serious
Vietnam
follows the example of neighbouring China. Web content is extensively
censored and e-mail is monitored in order to track down
"subversive" Internet users. Seven cyber-dissidents are in
prison.
Although
the Internet has so far only reached 3 per cent of the Vietnamese
population, it is growing fast. As in China, the government is grappling
with a dilemma. It wants to develop online access as a vehicle for
economic growth but it also wants to control its use. The authorities
proudly launched broadband connections in 2003 but they also announced
their intention to create a new police force to track down cyber-criminals.
Some
Internet users, the boldest or cleverest, manage to evade the censorship
imposed by the authorities. In a country where no independent newspaper is
tolerated and all the news media are controlled by the state,
cyber-dissidents risk heavy prison sentences for what they post on the
Internet. For most users, the Internet is a controlled information media
where self-censorship is the norm.
The
government has invested heavily in a "made in Vietnam"
communications surveillance system. Both the landline and mobile phones of
dissidents are tapped. The authorities also routinely intercept e-mail and
are able to identify where messages come from. In the course of two years,
seven dissidents were caught as a result of this kind of surveillance by
the Vietnamese cyber-police. Two of them were arrested in cybercafis. In
most cases they were accused of spying and were given sentences of up to
12 years in prison in summary trials that did not respect the right of
defence. They were also kept in prison for long periods without being
tried.
Censored
websites
The
authorities block access to the websites of the main human rights
organisations, including the Reporters Without Borders site and the sites
of Vietnamese dissidents in exile. They have also created a
Vietnamese-language search engine, www.search.com.vn, that only searches
official webpages. The few sites hosted in Vietnam must request permission
from the authorities to operate. In August 2002, the culture and
information ministry called for the blocking of content that was
"subversive" or "endangered national security."
The
telecommunications ministry issued a directive on the use and organisation
of the Internet on 25 May 2003. It said the Internet was a national
information resource and should therefore be "organised, studied and
use in an appropriate and effective way." It also declared a "strict
ban on use of the Internet to oppose Vietnam's socialist republic by
disturbing its security, economy, social order or traditional mode of
life."
This
directive gave birth to the Internet Centre of Vietnam, which was put in
charge of "organising and inspecting" Internet use under the
direct supervision of the ministry of posts and telecommunications. It is
responsible for resolving conflicts related to Internet use, investigating
violations of the directive and prosecuting offenders.
Heightened
control
Vietnam
has seven Internet Service Providers (ISPs), of which six are state-owned.
The seventh, OCI, is entirely privately-owned but has been operating with
official approval since June 2003. All the ISPs use the state-owned
Vietnam Post and Telecommunication Corporation's network. Its centralised
architecture facilitates Web surveillance and censoring of online
publications.
The
ministry of police announced on 29 January 2004 that everyone would
henceforth have to show ID in order to enter a cybercafi, and that a
record of users' identities and the websites they visit would have to be
kept by cybercafi managers for three months. Cybercafis would also have to
install software that monitors clients in real time and any client spotted
visiting "suspect" webpages would have to be reported to the
police, the ministry said.
Seven
imprisoned cyber-dissidents
Nguyen
Khac Toan, a businessman and former army officer, was arrested on 8
January 2002 in a Hanoi cybercafi and charged with e-mailing material to
"reactionary" Vietnamese human rights organisations abroad.
Found guilty of "spying," he was sentenced on 20 December 2002
to 12 years in prison and three years under house arrest.
Le Chi
Quang, a computer specialist and law graduate, was arrested on 21 February
2002 in a Hanoi cybercafi and was charged with sending "dangerous"
information abroad in the form of an article he had written which he
posted online. Called "Beware of the empire to the north," the
article referred to the circumstances in which the government signed
border agreements with China in 1999. He was sentenced on 8 November 2002
to four years in prison and three years under house arrest. He is
seriously ill with renal insufficiency.
Dr.
Pham Hong Son, a physician and representative of a foreign pharmaceutical
company, has been held in a prison near the capital since 27 March 2002
for translating an article from the US embassy website called "What
is democracy ?" and posting it online. He also wrote many articles
about democracy and human rights that were posted in Vietnamese discussion
forums. For the first four months, he was held in an undisclosed location
where he was not allowed to see his family or his lawyer. The Hanoi
people's court sentenced him on 18 June 2003 to 13 years in prison for
"spying" and three years under house arrest. The sentence was
reduced on appeal on 26 August 2003 to five years in prison and three
years under house arrest.
Nguyen
Vu Binh, a former journalist with the Communist Party newspaper Tap Chi
Cong San (Communist Reviews), was arrested on 25 September 2002 on a
charge of posting "reactionary" articles on the Internet,
including an essay entitled "Reflection on the Sino-Vietnamese border
accords" in which he criticised the 1999 treaty between China and
Vietnam. He was sentenced on 31 December 2003 to seven years in prison and
three years under house arrest. His sentence was upheld on appeal on 5 May
2004.
Pham
Que Duong was arrested on 28 December 2002 after a meeting in Saigon with
fellow cyber-dissident Tran Khue (see below). A former colonel in the
Liberation Army, he and Khue created a group called the "Association
of Vietnamese to help the Party and the Government fight Corruption."
He was charged with spying for allegedly having links to "reactionary"
groups abroad and using the Internet to receive and distribute documents
hostile to the communist regime. He has not yet been tried and faces a
life sentence.
Tran
Khue, a literature teacher and co-founder of an anti-corruption group, was
arrested in Saigon on 29 December 2002. He was accused of disseminating
criticism of the government because, although placed under house arrest
the previous March, he had continued to post articles and open letters on
the Internet. In one of his open letters, addressed to former Chinese
President Jiang Zemin, he had called for the revision of part of the
Sino-Vietnamese border accords. He is still awaiting trial.
Dr
Nguyen Dan Que, 61, a freedom of expression activist who had been released
in 1998 after nearly 20 years in prison, was re-arrested at his home in
Saigon on 17 March 2003. Officials did not give the reason for his arrest,
but it was thought to be linked with a statement he posted online
criticising the lack of press freedom in Vietnam. He was responding to
remarks by a foreign ministry spokesman five days earlier claiming that
freedom of information was guaranteed. Although he is ill with high blood
pressure and a stomach ulcer, his family has not been allowed to visit him
or give him the medicine he needs, and he has not been brought to trial.
On 22 September 2003, 12 Nobel Prize winners wrote to Communist Party
secretary-general Nong Duc Manh voicing concern about Que's health and
asking that he be allowed proper medical treatment and family visits
pending his release.
Convicted
over a petition
Tran
Dung Tien, 74, was arrested on 22 January 2003 and was not set free until
November of the same year. He had been sentenced to 10 months in prison
because, on 14 October 2002, he signed a petition calling for the release
of cyber-dissidents Le Chi Quang, Pham Hong Son, Nguyen Khac Toan and
Nguyen Vu Binh.
Nguyen
Vu Viet, 27 and Nguyen Truc Cuong, 36 - the nephews of imprisoned priest
Thadeus Nguyen Van Ly - and their sister Nguyen Thi Hoa, 44, were arrested
in June 2001 on charges of using e-mail, fax and telephone to disseminate
abroad information about religious freedom in Vietnam. They were initially
given prison terms ranging from three to five years. But the sentences of
Vu Viet and Truc Cuong were reduced to 32 months on appeal at the end of
November 2003, and the sentence of their sister, Thi Hoa, was reduced to
four months and six days. They were set free between November 2003 and
February 2004, shortly after the US House of Representatives passed a
resolution calling on Hanoi to release all Vietnamese held in prison or
under house arrest for practising their beliefs or defending freedom of
worship.
Links
The
official search engine:www.search.com.vn
Amnesty
International reports on Vietnam
http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-vnm/index
Government
website
www.vnn.vn
Ministry
of posts and telecommunications
www.vnpt.com.vn
* The
DAI (Digital Access Index) has been devised by the International
Telecommunications Union to measure the access of a country's inhabitants
to information and communication technology. It ranges from 0 (none at
all) to 1 (complete access).
**
Assessment of the situation in each country (good, middling, difficult,
serious) is based on murders, imprisonment or harassment of
cyber-dissidents or journalists, censorship of news sites, existence of
independent news sites, existence of independent ISPs and deliberately
high connection charges.
Reporters
Without Borders defends imprisoned journalists and press freedom
throughout the world, as well as the right to inform the public and to be
informed, in accordance with Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. Reporters Without Borders has nine national sections (in
Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and
the United Kingdom), representatives in Abidjan, Bangkok, Istanbul,
Montreal, Moscow, New York, Tokyo and Washington and more than a hundred
correspondents worldwide.
Third Annual Worldwide Press
Freedom Index
Press Release, 26 October 2004
East
Asia and Middle East have worst press freedom records, North Korea still
bottom, little improvement in China and Vietnam
Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans frontihres) announces its third
annual worldwide index of press freedom. Such freedom is threatened most
in East Asia (with North Korea at the bottom of the entire list at 167th
place, followed by Burma 165th, China 162nd, Vietnam 161st and Laos 153rd)
and the Middle East (Saudi Arabia 159th, Iran 158th, Syria 155th, Iraq
148th).
In these countries, an independent media either does not exist or
journalists are persecuted and censored on a daily basis. Freedom of
information and the safety of journalists are not guaranteed there.
Continuing war has made Iraq the most deadly place on earth for
journalists in recent years, with 44 killed there since fighting began in
March last year.
But there are plenty of other black spots around the world for press
freedom. Cuba (in 166th place) is second only to China as the biggest
prison for journalists, with 26 in jail (China has 27). Since spring last
year, these 26 independent journalists have languished in prison after
being given sentences of between 14 and 27 years.
No
privately-owned media exist in Turkmenistan (164th) and Eritrea (163rd),
whose people can only read, see or listen to government-controlled media
dominated by official propaganda.
The greatest press freedom is found in northern Europe (Denmark, Finland,
Ireland, Iceland, the Netherlands and Norway), which is a haven of peace
for journalists. Of the top 20 countries, only three (New Zealand 9th,
Trinidad and Tobago 11th and Canada 18th) are outside Europe.
Other
small and often impoverished democracies appear high on the list, such as
El Salvador (28th) and Costa Rica (35th) in Central America, along with
Cape Verde (38th) and Namibia (42nd) in Africa and Timor-Leste (57th) in
Asia.
Reporters Without Borders compiled the index by asking its partner
organisations (14 freedom of expression organisations in five continents),
its 130 correspondents around the world, as well as journalists,
researchers, jurists and human rights activists, to answer 52 questions to
indicate the state of press freedom in 167 countries (others were not
included for lack of information).
Too many Asian countries at the bottom of the list
For
the third year running, North Korea is bottom of the list. Reporters
Without Borders has just published a report of a fact-finding mission that
describes how journalism is forced to serve the cult of personality of
dictator Kim Jong-il. Dozens of journalists have been "re-educated"
for often minor supposed professional "errors."
At the
other extreme is New Zealand, in 9th place, which is the top-listed
non-European country. News diversity is respected in this Pacific
democracy and the government does not interfere.
At the bottom end is Burma (165th), whose military rulers have banned the
privately-owned media from speaking freely and thrown in prison
journalists supporting opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi. The press is
also cowed in Vietnam (161st) and Laos (153rd).
China
still scores very low (162nd) despite the growth of print and broadcast
media, since the ruling Communist Party has used violence to indicate the
lines that must not be crossed. The country is the world's biggest prison
for journalists, with the most recent victim a Chinese correspondent for
the US daily the New York Times. Despite promises made when Beijing
was awarded the 2008 Olympic Games, the locally-based foreign media is
still closely monitored.
No
let-up in violence
Violence
against the media continues to undermine freedom in many Asian
countries.Nepal (160th) and Bangladesh (151st) rate very low due to
incessant violence there. The governments are partly to blame but
political groups, especially the Maoist rebels in Nepal, as well as
organised crime also persecute journalists.
Countries such as the Philippines (111th), India (120th) and Indonesia
(117th) figure in the bottom half of the index despite having free and
lively independent media, since killings and physical attacks on
journalists, along with outdated laws, still prevent a full flowering of
the press.
Violence against the media in India rarely comes from the authorities but
from political activists and in Kashmir from armed groups. The authorities
in the Indonesian province of Aceh and the army in Pakistan's tribal areas
have sealed off these areas to the media.Pakistan (150th) dropped about 20
places because of this and increased army pressure on the local press.
The Maldives (157th) lost ground in this year's index because of a
crackdown on journalists and pro-democracy activists by longtime President
Maumoon Abdul Gayoom.
Delicate situations
The
situation in Afghanistan (97th) improved markedly however, with growing
news diversity and the media daring to tackle sensitive topics. But
threats to journalists, especially from provincial warlords, remain very
real.
In
Japan (42nd), the media is diverse and powerful, but the system of kisha
clubs still deprives foreign and freelance journalists of access to a lot
of information. In South Korea (48th) and Taiwan (60th), the government is
not always tolerant of opposition media.
Vietnam
Attack on Mennonites Highlights Religious Persecution
For
Immediate Release:
For
more information, please contact:
Human
Rights Watch
In
New York, Brad Adams: +1 212 216 1228
In
London, Urmi Shah: +44 207 713 2788
In
Brussels, Vanessa Saenen: +322 732 2009
(New
York, October 22, 2004) - Vietnam's recent demolition of a Mennonite
chapel in Kontum province highlights the country's intensifying campaign
against religious freedom, Human Rights Watch said today. A new law
expected to go into effect in November bans any religious activity deemed
to threaten national security, public order or national unity.
The
recent attacks on the Mennonites, a Protestant denomination not recognized
by the government, occurred against a backdrop of a crackdown on
independent religious groups, in particular members of the Unified
Buddhist Church of Vietnam and ethnic minority Protestants in the northern
and central highlands. During the last year, several protestant pastors
and independent Buddhist monks have been detained and their places of
worship shut down, cordoned off, or placed under surveillance. At least
two Catholic priests and one Catholic layperson are serving long prison
sentences for holding training courses and distributing books or leaflets.
The
Vietnamese government bans independent religious associations and only
permits religious activities by officially-recognized churches and
organizations whose governing boards are approved and controlled by
government. The Mennonite Church is not officially sanctioned by the
government
"Bulldozing
a Mennonite chapel is just one aspect of the Vietnamese government's
crackdown on freedom of religion," said Brad Adams, executive
director of Human Rights Watch's Asia Division. "Whether through
legislation or through violence, the government has shown it is
increasingly unwilling to tolerate religious practice outside its strict
control."
On
the morning of September 24, more than 200 officials, including
paramilitary police from Unit 113, descended on the chapel and home of
Pastor Nguyen Cong Chinh in Kontum province. Pastor Chinh is
superintendent of the Mennonite churches in the Central Highlands. The
attack marked the second time the chapel was destroyed this year. On
January 16, authorities bulldozed the same chapel, which doubles as Pastor
Chinh's residence.
In
the September 24 attack, government officials confiscated Chinh's property
and farm animals, set fire to the house and chapel, and then used two
bulldozers to flatten the remains. Chinh was out on a pastoral visit at
the time, but his wife and children were arrested by officials and
detained at Vinh Quang district headquarters from 9:30 am to 4:30 pm that
day. Mrs. Chinh, who is seven months pregnant, reported being hit in the
stomach and stepped on while in custody. Chinh reportedly went into hiding
after returning to the scene briefly after the destruction was complete.
"All
that remains of the Mennonite chapel in the Central Highlands is a cement
floor," wrote Pastor Chinh in a letter dated September 25. "Many
questions about this action await answers by leaders in Vietnam and abroad
- this action which so seriously violates our human rights and religious
freedom in a brazen way."
A
new Ordinance on Religious Beliefs and Religious Organizations, passed by
Vietnam's National Assembly last June, is expected to go into effect in
November. Its first article, quoting Vietnam's Constitution, pays lip
service to freedom of religion, but most of the remaining articles
restrict that freedom and expand government controls over religion. The
Ordinance also bans religious activities based on vague standards of
national security. (To read the Ordinance, please see: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2004/10/21/vietna9551.htm.)
The
Ordinance, which applies to all religious activity in Vietnam, requires
religious leaders to follow the principle of "national unity"
and to educate their followers about patriotism.
"The
proposed ordinance on religious beliefs formalizes the serious
restrictions already imposed on religious practice in Vietnam," Adams
said. "This legislation impermissibly imposes the government's
political goals on religious practice in Vietnam."
In
late September, leaders of Vietnam's unregistered house church
organizations, including some of the Mennonite churches, petitioned the
head of the National Assembly and other top officials about their strong
concerns that the new legislation will provide a legal basis to
permanently outlaw their organizations.
"Thousands
of Vietnamese citizens are being persecuted simply because they want to
worship outside government restrictions," Adams said. "The
government has not made any credible charges that the Mennonite church
constitutes a threat to national security - this is just about control
over public life."
Background
on Crackdown on Mennonites in Vietnam
The
Mennonite Central Committee, which is the social service arm of the
Mennonite Church, was one of the very few western charitable organizations
to continue work in Vietnam in the immediate aftermath of the communist
victory in 1975 and the reunification of the country shortly thereafter.
However, members of the banned Mennonite church have come under increasing
pressure from the government in recent years. On May 15, 2004, authorities
arrested Mennonite Pastor Ksor No, head of the congregation in Ia Grai
district, Gia Lai. The reason for his arrest is not known; authorities
presented no warrant or document to his family to inform them why he had
been arrested.
In
June, Pastor Nguyen Hong Quang, an outspoken Mennonite church leader in Ho
Chi Minh City, was arrested after publicly criticizing the government for
detaining four Mennonites three months earlier. Quang, who is trained as a
lawyer, has defended farmers' land rights cases, spoken out against the
arrests of religious and political dissidents, and publicized the plight
of minority Christian churches in the Central Highlands. Many of his
critical writings have been disseminated on the Internet in both
Vietnamese and English.
In
2002 and 2003 Human Rights Watch received several reports about police
ransacking the homes of Mennonite believers and confiscating Bibles in
Kontum. Officials have withheld the residence permit (ho khau in
Vietnamese) of Pastor Chinh and other Mennonites, which makes it difficult
to legally find work, travel, and rent or own a home. In addition, local
vigilantes in Kontum have reportedly beaten Mennonite workers and arranged
hit-and-run motorcycle "accidents" to intimidate members of the
church and pressure them to renounce their faith.
In
September 2004, the US State Department designated Vietnam as a "Country
of Particular Concern" because of what it called Vietnam's "particularly
severe violations of religious freedom." The European Union and Japan
have also expressed concern about repression of religious and political
rights in Vietnam. In October, more than 100 members of the European
Parliament called on the EU and EC to highlight Vietnam's human rights
record during meetings of the Asia-Europe Economic Summit (ASEM) held in
Hanoi. During the meetings the Dutch Foreign Minister, on behalf of the
EU, called for the release of political and religious prisoners.
Father
Chan Tins Letter
From:
Rev. CHAN TIN,
CssR
38, Ky Dong,
Phuong 9, Quan 3,
Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam
Mail: stephan_chantin@yahoo.ca
To:
Most Reverend
CHARLES J.CHAPUT
Ambassador
JOHN V. HANFORD
Honorable
Members of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom
Vietnam, October 11, 2004
Dear
Sirs and Madams,
I
am Rev. Stephan Chan Tin, a Catholic priest for over 80 years and an
activist for religious freedom since 1975. On behalf of everyone working
for religious freedom here in Vietnam, I would like to express our deep
gratitude and congratulation to the USCIRF on your success in convincing
the US State Department to put Hanoi regime and others on the list of
Countries of Particular Concern.
We
would like to particularly thank Ambassador John Hanford for your two
fact-finding trips to Vietnam. Prior to your investigation, we had been
trying for years to get the information regarding the severe condition of
religious oppression in Vietnam to the world community with humble results.
We
believe the only effective way to make the current communist government
listen is the strong and united voice of the world governments. People
inside Vietnam have tried repeatedly to raise our voices peacefully but
were suppressed violently every time. The latest incident was the peaceful
demonstration of highland Christians in April 2004. Our brothers and
sisters in this area are still being persecuted at this very moment.
Currently, many religious leaders are held in prisons or labor camps.
While the world know well the fight of a few such as Father Nguyen Van Ly,
Reverend Nguyen Hong Quang, Venerable Thich Quang Do, Venerable Thich
Huyen Quang, many other clerics and religious laypeople are sharing the
same, if not worse, suffering in total darkness.
I
was informed that some Vietnamese government officials and religious
representatives of the government-controlled churches have been sent to
the US and Europe to draw a different picture of the religious freedom in
Vietnam. While trusting that you will see through such ploys I still would
like to bring to your attention the Government Order on Faith and Religion
(Phap Lenh Tin Nguong Ton Giao) that is issued recently and will take
effect on November 15, 2004. In our opinion, this is essentially the
government's legalization of on-going suppression and gradual destruction
of religions in Vietnam. In short, the communist government's hostile
policy toward independent religious organizations has not changed at all,
except for more sophisticated camouflage to the outside world.
We
sincerely pray that your honorable commission will continue to see through
the cover of the perpetrators of religious oppression around the world and
reach the victims in the darkest corners.
May
God bless you abundantly on your holy mission.
Sincerely
yours
Stephan
Chan Tin
Accustomed
to corruption
The
Vietnam Investment Review
September
29, 2004 Wednesday
URL: http://www.vir.com.vn/
Corruption
has been named one of the four factors most likely to stymie development
in Vietnam but, as Ngoc Mai reports, the government is beginning to make
public examples of officials caught with their hands in the till to change
the long-held view in society that slipping someone an envelope is a
harmless courtesy.
Deception
over the purchase and development of land is almost a matter of course
When senior trade ministry official Le Van Thang was arrested at his Ngo
Quyen street office two weeks ago, accused of accepting money in exchange
for garment quotas to the US, PetroVietnam officials, who have offices on
the same street and several of whom also stand accused of corruption,
bemoaned the curse of Ngo Quyen.
But
such a light-hearted brushing off of corruption is no longer acceptable,
according to the government.
And
the performance of Minister of Trade Truong Dinh Tuyen, who held a
surprisingly candid impromptu press conference two days after Thang's
arrest, would suggest things are changing.
Tuyen
was battered by questions from dozens of journalists for more than two
hours on the sidelines of a trade seminar, but he remained composed and
answered every question in a straightforward manner.
"When
bad things happened within a ministry, the ministry's leaders have to take
responsibility. It is the same at any ministry," he said simply.
PetroVietnam's
general director Nguyen Ngoc Canh also came out to face the music several
months ago, after at least high-ranking PetroVietnam officials were
arrested on corruption charges that cost the state millions of dollars.
This
up-front attitude is warranted given the fact that corruption has been
identified as one of the four factors most likely to hold back the
development of Vietnam, the director of the State Inspectorate's Research
Institute, Nguyen Van Thanh, told a regional workshop on ethics and
accountability
in Hanoi last week.
But
rather than place the responsibility for stopping corruption with top
government officials, the inspectorate says the fight against graft is
everyone's problem.
"Some
of us may think that when we accept money in certain situations it is not
corruption because everyone does it. It's like a kind of 'custom',"
said the institute's deputy director Dinh Van Minh.
Receiving
an envelope containing money at public and private meetings has become
common practice in Vietnam; a cultural habit, some say.
Reporters
might get an envelope from press conferences or give an envelope to their
sources. Doctors might get envelopes from patients for treatment. Teachers
might get envelopes on special occasions from parents of pupils.
Vietnam
introduced an ordinance on measures designed to fight corruption in 1998,
in which corruption is defined as taking a bribe, taking advantages of
one's position and power to appropriate assets, taking advantages of one's
position and power while responsible for a public service, abusing one's
power while responsible for a public service, taking advantage of one's
position and power to influence others for benefit, and committing fraud
for personal benefit.
Current
Vietnamese law provides for two main measures for dealing with corruption,
including criminal punishments and administrative sanctions. The highest
sanctions for corruption are life imprisonment and the death penalty.
Earlier
this year, La Thi Kim Oanh, the former director of a state company under
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, received the death penalty
after she was convicted of embezzling $4.6 million. Two former deputy
ministers from MARD, Nguyen Thien Luan and Le Quang Ha, got three-year
prison sentences for their involvement and the scandal also
forced
MARD minister Le Huy Ngo to resign.
The
press has played a key role in uncovering all of these cases of corruption
and that role should be developed, says the state inspectorate.
"State
inspectorates, investigation agencies and the press are those who are
discovering corruption," Thanh said.
He
admitted that local state management agencies were not paying enough
attention to the problem.
"Local
officials need to become more involved in the detection of corruption,"
he said.
The
State Inspectorate Agency has been studying how best to improve the
procedure for dealing with complaints from members of the public, focusing
more on the responsibilities of state managers, especially at key state
enterprises, and re-defining the role of the state inspectorate.
Five
measures for improving the detection and prevention of corruption have
been suggested. They include providing a set of prohibited activities for
public employees, raising the transparency and democracy of state agencies,
controlling the income and property of public employees, strengthening
cooperation among state agencies responsible for inspection, investigation
and prosecution work, and providing measures for promoting the involvement
of the public in discovering corruption, such as encouraging citizens to
denounce wrongdoing by public employees.
The
last measure seems to be the most effective way but how to create such a
mechanism is another challenge for Vietnamese policy makers.
In
1981, an ordinance on punishment for corruption offered 10 per cent of the
sum involved in a particular graft case to the group or person that
alerted the authorities.
The
current law only says that those who do a good job fighting and preventing
corruption will be rewarded.
Obviously,
the legal system has to encourage people to weed out corruption and inform
either the police or state officials, but on the other hand, the law must
protect the informers. The accusers will have to consider what they will
get and what they risk by reporting corruption to the police. In many
cases, the informer will be exposing his or her boss, friend or relative.
British
ethics expert Denis Osborne told last week's Hanoi conference on ethics
and accountability that in some countries, "corruption is so popular
that corrupted people do not think that they are corrupted".
And if
this is the case for Vietnam, then the situation is improving. With at
least three cases of large-scale corruption involving high-ranking
government officials recently tackled in the public eye, it seems the
government is making an effort to clean-up its image.
And
although some might say this has come late in the game, it is better than
never.
The
Crossroads: The Drive For Change
The
Vietnam Investment Review
September
29, 2004 Wednesday
URL:
http://www.vir.com.vn/
'They
pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work'. Despite 15 years of reform,
this adage about the lot of a state worker still holds true -- as does the
consequences of their disenchantment. Tu Giang reports on the bribery,
excessive paperwork and long waits that are still commonplace in Vietnam's
public administration system and finds that state workers are not only to
blame.
Vietnam
began its reform process, doi moi, more than a decade and a half ago.
Though it has since made undeniable progress, it is now poised at the
crossroads where major obstacles stand in the way of further progress.
What
are these obstacles? Experts place public administration reform (PAR) at
the top of the list of issues the country needs to address. Then follow
other heavyweight tasks like international integration, state-owned
enterprise reform, corruption, poverty reduction, the fight against
HIV/AIDS and so on.
What is the need for PAR? Professor Nguyen Mai, a member of the prime
minister's advisory board, said Vietnam's economic reform had reached a
level where it could not but implement administration reform.
He
admitted that for a long time, Vietnam, like China, had been wary of the
lessons of perestroika and glasnost in the former Soviet Union and had
focused on reforming the economy rather than public administration.
But
10 years ago, the government did begin to turn its attention to PAR, to
the three main pillars of institutional reform: organisational machinery
reform, capacity-building for civil servants and public financial reform.
Administrative
procedure reform was also identified as a key focus, especially in six
priority fields - customs, import/export, land, taxation, migration and
immigration.
With
support from international donors, the government went ahead, drafting new
laws, frameworks and strategies for PAR.
However,
Mai is not impressed with the speed at which it has been done. "The
prime minister first touched upon PAR in 1994. But, unfortunately, our PAR
implementation has remained stuck for the past 10 years and, in my opinion,
is a failure," he told a conference recently.
Troubling
issues
Why
are civil servants lackadaisical about matters of great urgency to
individuals and businesses?
Why
are citizens and organisations looking for administrative service harassed
for bribes and by the irrational and sluggish character of administrative
machinery?
Why
do they have to put up with cumbersome processes and procedures,
bureaucracy, lack of responsibility and the arrogance of cadres and civil
servants handling their files?
These
questions and more have been troubling the experts. And for an answer,
they point to the low wages civil servants are paid.
Decades
ago, when the Vietnamese economy was centrally-managed and the subsidy
mechanism still existed, civil servants used to say "[the state]
pretends to pay us and we pretend to work".
But
now, after more than one and a half decades of doi moi, little has changed.
Though the minimum salary levels have been raised several times for state
employees during the period, they remain ridiculously low - at VND290,000
($19) per month or the price of two pairs of trousers.
Mai
Quoc Binh, former director of Ho Chi Minh City's Public Administration
Reform Steering Committee, admitted: "even if the current salary
level doubles, it is not enough for the subsistence of state employees and
their families."
Though
admitting that the government's limited resources precluded its efforts at
salary reform, he warned that "if the salary is kept at low levels
like at present, it would continue to distort the administration machine".
Decentralising
power
However,
the salaries are only one part of the story. On the other are questions
like "who is to blame for even official development assistance (ODA)
projects getting delayed?". Decisions about virtually everything
related to ODA still need to come from the Office of Government rather
than being made at lower levels.
Clearly,
the administrative structure is the culprit.
Lack
of accountability and a complex and often overlapping administration
machinery, formed during war time, continue to plague decision-making.
Trang
A Pao, chairman of the Ethnic Committee of the National Assembly, had a
dramatic experience with public officials to recount.
When
Pao moved from Lao Cai province to Hanoi to take up the National Assembly
assignment in 2002, he had to go to the police for permanent residential
registration.
The
police returned his application four times, each time with a different
explanation. Sometimes, they asked for documents proving Pao owned a house
in Hanoi. Other times, they wanted the state decision concerning his job
assignment. He was asked to furnish documents he did not know existed.
Finally,
exhausted, Pao took his application directly to the head of the Hanoi
police. Everything was done within a day; only, he got the registration
but his wife and children did not.
"If
even high-ranked officials like me is harassed, what of ordinary citizens?"
he said.
"[Civilians]
can be troubled to death," Pao told the National Assembly earlier
this year.
Vietnam
is among the few countries in the world still requiring permanent
residential registration without which a citizen cannot apply for marriage
registration, identification card, schooling or other basic rights.
If
Pao's story is a pointer to how ordinary people are ill-treated by
officials, Phan Manh Chinh's turns the spotlight on an insidious
consequence of redtape - holding up national development.
Chinh
is the director of a company building major urban development projects in
Hanoi. When they were working on building a suspension bridge at the
capital's Vong cross-section three years ago, they discovered a
finger-like cable under the ground. Not knowing to which agency it
belonged,
Chinh placed many advertisements in newspapers asking "who?".
He
received no reply for three months.
After that, Chinh began sending thick piles of documents to various
agencies in Hanoi, whom he though might solve the matter. It took six
months and 36 signatures and seals before he could continue construction.
"For
a small cable, I had to spend six months. You know, there were so many
other underground networks - water supply, sewerage and others - at that
intersection," he said with a grin.
Minister
of Home Affairs, Do Quang Trung, visited several major ports two years ago
and was astonished and annoyed by what he discovered there. A ship
arriving in a Vietnamese port had to fill in 36 kinds of documents and
furnish 27 others to 15 administrative agencies. While departing from
Vietnam, it had to fill in 17 kinds of documents and furnish 13 to those
15 state agencies.
Nowadays,
following the reform of customs and ports, a vessel just needs to fill in
nine documents and produce 11 others to six administrative agencies.
It
probably explains why shipping a 40-foot container from Saigon Port to New
York costs US$3,800 while the same-sized container costs $1,000 less for
transport from China.
The
country's top leaders acknowledge this problem. Prime Minister Phan Van
Khai admitted recently that many cadres and civil servants in state
agencies were oblivious to the worries and urgencies felt by businesses
and individuals.
"The
government has made mistakes in that we have not sensitised the
administration machinery to state management functions in a market economy,"
Khai told the National Assembly earlier this year.
"We
are determined to discipline heads of state administrative agencies at
different levels who violate administrative principles and thus undermine
the reform process," he added.
But
the prime minister, who has approved the PAR strategy for the next 10
years and the programme to expand the one-stop-shop model across the
country, admitted that the road ahead for PAR was uneven and stormy.
American
Legion National Commander Calls For Senate Vote On Vietnam Human Rights
Act Of 2004
For
Immediate Release
INDIANAPOLIS (Sept. 29, 2004)
The top official of the worlds largest veterans service organization is
calling on members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee to bring
to a vote a bill that aims to improve Vietnams worsening record on human
rights and religious freedom.
Severe
religious persecution is standard practice in Vietnam, and it is worsening,
said Thomas P. Cadmus of Michigan, national commander of the 2.7-million
member American Legion. Hundreds of Christians, Buddhists and followers of
other faiths are in jail today, or under house arrest without charges, for
peacefully following beliefs that are not authorized by the government.The
Vietnam Human Rights Act of 2004, sponsored by Rep. Christopher Smith,
R-N.J., passed by a 323-45 vote in the House on July 19. The Senate
version was introduced by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., on Sept. 9.
It
was referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where it has yet to
be considered.A similar measure passed by a 410-1 landslide in the House
in 2001 but stalled in committee after it was referred to the Senate. The
number of killings, beatings and arrests of innocent worshipers in Vietnam
since the death of that bill is anyones guess, Cadmus writes in an
editorial released to nationwide today. It is unconscionable to fail these
prayerful people so many of whom are allies we left behind in
Vietnam because some members of the Senate wont so much as give this bill
its day in court. By failing to act, the committee also sends a message to
Hanoi, which covets U.S. aid and trade but, as yet, has been given no good
reason to change its draconian human-rights policies.
On
Sept. 15, Vietnam was designated by the U.S. State Department as a country
of particular concern under the International Religious Freedom Act. The
designation is shared with North Korea, Iran, Burma, China, Eritrea, Saudi
Arabia and Sudan. Among the primary targets of Vietnams religious
persecution and human-rights abuses are the Montagnard people of the
central highlands who fought alongside U.S. soldiers in the Vietnam War.
Christian Montagnards were reportedly attacked and beaten by Vietnam
government authorities during a prayer vigil last Easter weekend. Numerous
other abuses, including violence and church destruction, have been widely
reported since 2000. New laws in Vietnam are set to take effect Nov. 15
that would give the government greater freedom to restrict worship.
In
the editorial, the commander calls upon all veterans and all Americans who
value freedom and human rights to demand immediate Senate action on the
bill, which will die at the end of the 108th Congress if not acted on. To
neglect our former allies again is, at best, to subject them to Communist
thought control, Cadmus states. At worst, our lack of action delivers
their death sentence America must do better.
Thomas
P. Cadmus, a U.S. Army veteran from Ypsilanti, Mich., is national
commander of the 2.7 million-member American Legion, the nation's largest
veterans organization.
Media
contact: Contact: Joe March, (317) 630-1253 orRamona Joyce, (202)
263-2982. A color photo of Cmdr. Cadmus is available upon request or
may be downloaded at www.legion.org.
Survival
Of Former U.S. Allies Depends On Vietnam Human Rights Act Of 2004
The
American Legion Office of the National Commander
Immediate
Release - Sept. 29, 2004
By
Thomas P. Cadmus
Thousands
of Christians from the remote central highlands of Vietnam gathered in
their provincial capitals for a prayer vigil last Easter weekend. As they
knelt, according to well-documented reports, communist authorities and
soldiers in civilian clothes bludgeoned them with clubs, shovels and
nail-affixed boards. The exact number killed and injured is unknown,
withheld by a government that keeps its human-rights abuses well-veiled to
the rest of the world. After the massacre, access to the highlands by
foreign observers was blocked for a two-week period and, following that,
was tightly controlled to only certain villages. Hundreds were reportedly
arrested, tortured and jailed.
This
was no isolated incident.
Severe
religious persecution is standard practice in Vietnam, and it is
escalating. Hundreds of Christians, Buddhists and followers of other
faiths are in jail today, or under house arrest without charges, for
peacefully following beliefs not authorized by the government. Vietnam
requires government registration of churches and maintains control over
their activities from charity work to ministerial advancement to the
content and publication of religious literature.
Religious
freedom abuses have intensified in Vietnam despite the 2001 passage of a
bilateral trade agreement with the United States and multiple warnings
from the U.S. State Department. On Sept. 15, Secretary of State Colin
Powell presented a report designating Vietnam as a country of
particular concern under the International Religious Freedom Act,
joining such reviled human-rights performers as North Korea, Iran, Burma,
China, Eritrea, Saudi Arabia and Sudan. The report thoroughly chronicled
dozens of government-sanctioned abuses, often violent, against many faiths,
primarily those followed by ethnic minorities in the central and northwest
highlands.
An
estimated 400 churches have been destroyed by the government in Vietnam
since 2000. One Catholic priest, Father Nguyen Van Ly, was arrested in May
2001 and sentenced to 15 years in prison for damaging the governments
unity policy by writing a letter critical of the Vietnamese
government to a U.S. human-rights commission. He remains behind bars, as
do at least a confirmed 44 other religious leaders.
The
Vietnam government routinely attempts to force believers of unauthorized
religions to recant their faiths. Some reportedly have been coerced to
drink animal blood mixed with alcohol in staged ceremonies to promote the
revival of ancient tribal rituals that wont compete with atheistic
communist doctrine. A new law, set to take effect Nov. 15, will allow
Vietnamese authorities greater freedom to arrest anyone whose religious
practices differ with government wishes, even in their own homes.
In the
crosshairs of these abuses are some of the most loyal wartime allies
America has ever known: the indigenous Montagnard people. Approximately
half of the adult male Montagnard population was killed in action,
fighting alongside U.S. soldiers during the Vietnam War. After Saigon fell
in 1975, most of the Montagnards were landlocked and unable to escape,
left to face a vengeful new regime on their own. Only a handful made it
out. Since then, while the rest of Vietnam has tripled in population, the
number of Montagnards has been culled nearly in half through a process
some watchdog groups call cultural leveling. Others call it
genocide. Accusations of government-coerced sterilization, property
seizure and harassment are widespread.
Meanwhile,
the Vietnam Human Rights Act of 2004 languishes in the U.S. Senate Foreign
Relations Committee.
The
bill would simply freeze non-humanitarian U.S. aid to Vietnam at 2004
levels, meaning no new increases in funding until the communist regime
proves substantial progress on human rights and religious freedom. The
measure, H.R. 1587, was introduced by Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., and
passed overwhelmingly in the House on July 19. The Senate version was
introduced Sept. 9 by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and was referred to the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee. But without further action, the
measure will die with the end of 108th Congress.
A
similar Vietnam human-rights bill introduced in 2001 passed by a 410-1
landslide in the House, only to die later in committee. At the time, Sen.
John Kerry, D-Mass., served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, and opposed the bill. In a
widely publicized 2002 letter, Kerry wrote that he and Sen. John McCain,
R-Ariz., alike feared it may hinder rather than advance the
cause of human rights in Vietnam. We are concerned that denying aid to
Vietnam would actually slow human-rights improvements.
Smiths
bill does not deny aid. It merely caps non-humanitarian U.S. aid at 2004
levels until Vietnam proves its human-rights and religious freedom
policies are improving.
Since
the 2001 version was denied a vote in the Senate, the number of killings,
beatings and arrests of innocent worshipers in Vietnam is anyones
guess. Reports of abuses, meanwhile, keep piling up.
It is
unconscionable to fail these prayerful people so many of whom are
allies we left behind in Vietnam because some members of the Senate
wont so much as give this bill its day in court. By failing to act,
the committee also sends a message to Hanoi, which covets U.S. aid and
trade but, as yet, has been given no good reason to change its draconian
human-rights policies.
All
these former allies to whom thousands of U.S. veterans owe their
lives want is the freedom to pray for something better. Their faith
rests in us.
Every
American who values freedom of religion, basic human rights and support
for former allies in their time of need must contact their U.S. senators
immediately and demand a vote on the Vietnam Human Rights Act of 2004. To
neglect our former allies once again is, at best, to subject them to
communist thought control. At worst, our lack of action delivers their
death sentence. As the worlds leading voice of freedom,
democracy and human dignity, America simply must do better. All it takes
is a vote.
*
Thomas P. Cadmus of Michigan is the National Commander of The American
Legion, the worlds largest veterans service organization
Ambassador's
Speech To The American Chamber Of Commerce In Hanoi
Tuesday,
September 28, 2004
Thank
you Terence. Good evening, Ladies and Gentlemen.
First
of all, I would like to thank the American Chamber of Commerce Board of
Governors for inviting me to speak to you so early in my stay in Vietnam.
In addition, I would like to note the presence of a senior visitor from
Washington here tonight, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for
Economic and Business Affairs Shaun Donnelly. I hope that many of you have
had a chance to chat with Ambassador Donnelly who is one of the State
Department's most senior economic officials. This is his first trip to
Vietnam, and as we all know, there is nothing like seeing a situation
first hand, so we were very pleased that he could arrange to stop in Hanoi
on this trip.
What
I would like to do this evening is take stock of our bilateral
relationship with Vietnam, focusing primarily on the economic and
commercial aspects. Afterwards, I would be happy to take a few of your
questions. But please note that I am new. So, I may be forced to ask for
your forbearance on a tough question or two, but if I need to do that, we
will get back to you with an answer quickly.
The
U.S.-Vietnam relationship has come a long way in a relatively short period
of time. Cooperation on the issue of the fullest possible accounting for
our missing personnel from the Indochina conflict provided the initial
impetus that enabled us to move relations forward and this issue remains
one of our top priorities. From the very limited relationship in the 1980s
to normalization of relations in 1995, we moved on to negotiate a
Bilateral Trade Agreement (or BTA) in 2001 followed by agreements
involving counter-narcotics and civil aviation in the past year. Current
ties with Vietnam encompass an increasingly diverse and complex set of
issues; foremost among these is Vietnam's need to adhere to universally
recognized standards of human rights, including religious freedom. Also
critical to the expanding relationship are the issues of trade and
investment, regional security, counterterrorism, global health,
humanitarian demining, and the struggle to combat transnational crime,
particularly narcotics trafficking and trafficking in persons.
My
own Vietnam experience dates back to the years 1988 to 1990 when I was
Deputy Director of the State Department's Office of Vietnam, Laos and
Cambodia Affairs. At that time, we concentrated on the POW/MIA issue and
other humanitarian issues. During those two years, I traveled to Hanoi six
times for discussions regarding the efforts of U.S. NGOs to assist
Vietnamese children and disabled war veterans. These talks were a key part
of our efforts to encourage Vietnamese cooperation in our ongoing quest to
achieve the fullest possible accounting of our missing personnel. When I
returned to Hanoi for the first time since 1990 some two weeks ago, I
quickly realized that this is a different Vietnam and a very different
U.S.-Vietnam relationship.
Let's
turn to our economic relationship with Vietnam. In my view, the United
States and Vietnam need to continue to expand our economic relationship
and to leverage the good will it can create to broaden our bilateral
relations as well as to benefit our two economies.
Our
deepening economic and commercial ties support the growth of civil
society, encourage economic reform, draw Vietnam deeper into the
rules-based international trading system, and further the interests of
Vietnamese and American workers, consumers, farmers and business people.
If
Vietnam fully implements its BTA obligations, it will also strengthen its
candidacy for the World Trade Organization. I am convinced that assisting
Vietnam to accede to the WTO supports the long-term interests of the
United States, since further progress on economic reform will help create
conditions that encourage the kinds of social and political changes that
we hope to see here.
The
BTA has had a significant impact on our bilateral trade over the past two
years, but that fast growth is slowing now. Final trade figures for 2003
showed $5.88 billion in total bilateral trade almost double that of 2002.
Total trade for the first seven months of this year is about equal to
total trade during the same period in 2003, so this could also be a good
year, although not necessarily a record-breaking one. As a direct result
of lower tariff levels, Vietnam's exports to the United States rose by
some 128% in 2002 and 90% in 2003, while our exports to Vietnam, boosted
by the sale of some Boeing aircraft, have also risen markedly. Vietnam
received the fourth and last Boeing under the initial contract signed in
2001 some nine days ago. Of course, we look forward to and will push hard
for more purchases of Boeings by Vietnam Airlines.
Vietnam's
official figures on U.S. investment in this country have risen this year
to just over $1 billion, but this understates the real total. This data
does not include investments by U.S. subsidiaries in Singapore and
elsewhere in the region, such as nearly $1 billion by Cono-Phillips alone.
I have just seen the preliminary results of a new survey that also counts
U.S.- related investment. The survey shows $2.6 billion in realized
U.S.-related investment through the end of 2003. It also shows that
investment by U.S. firms grew significantly last year.
The
2001 Bilateral Trade Agreement is helping to create a rules-based system
in Vietnam. This agreement binds Vietnam to an unprecedented array of
reform commitments over a ten-year period in its legal and regulatory
structures and has thus become a key catalyst for change. The BTA
eliminates non-tariff barriers, cuts tariffs on a number of U.S. exports
and gives Vietnam Most Favored Nation access to the U.S. market. When
fully implemented, the BTA will provide for effective protection and
enforcement of intellectual property rights (better known as IPR), open
Vietnam's market to U.S. service providers, and create fair and
transparent rules and regulations for U.S. investors.
One
priority area where Vietnam has not kept pace with its BTA obligations is
in the enforcement of IPR. The efforts of the Government of Vietnam to put
in place strong IPR enforcement measures are not only important for BTA
implementation and WTO accession, but also for the country's continued
strong economic growth and development. IPR enforcement encourages both
domestic and foreign investment in IP-dependent sectors such as
information technology. Vietnams success in developing these sectors
and in encouraging badly needed investment to do so will be directly
proportional to its success in reducing piracy and counterfeiting.
In
December 2004, several important BTA obligations will come due. These
include significant tariff reductions; phasing out of some import quotas;
the introduction of some new trading rights; authorization for U.S.
companies to mortgage land use rights at foreign banks; permission to
establish joint ventures for internet services, and a reduction in a
number of restrictions on U.S. investment including the elimination of
minimum capital requirements for joint ventures.
Vietnam
continues to make progress on its WTO accession bid, most recently at the
8th Working Party held in June in Geneva. The United States and
Vietnam also held bilateral market access negotiations on goods and
services on the margins of that meeting. Deputy United States Trade
Representative Josette Shiner came to Hanoi in July and had discussions on
the status of our bilateral trade relationship as well as on WTO issues.
We are working toward another round of bilateral market access talks in
Washington in late October. These will be followed, we hope, by another
Working Party meeting in Geneva in December.
The
Vietnamese Government has flagged telecommunications, distribution,
transport and financial services as tough areas for liberalization.
Nevertheless, the United States will continue to pursue further progress
in these areas as well as in agriculture. Questions also remain on whether
Vietnam can implement the necessary broad reforms in the near term and if
the pace of the necessary National Assembly deliberations can meet
Vietnams target date. So, while not an impossible target, Vietnam
will need to move quickly to meet its goal of accession to the WTO by the
end of 2005.
The
U.S.-Vietnam Air Transport Agreement was signed in Washington during
Deputy Prime Minister Vu Khoan's visit last December. United Airlines is
preparing to become the first U.S. air carrier to take advantage of the
provision for direct flights with a route from San Francisco to Ho Chi
Minh City via Hong Kong. We expect to see a United Airlines aircraft
landing in Ho Chi Minh City before Christmas.
Since
Vietnam is not a WTO member, it will still be subject to garment quotas
next year after the expiration of the multilateral Agreement on Textiles
and Clothing on January 1, 2005. In July, the United States and Vietnam
extended the bilateral textile agreement until December 31, 2005. This
extension will expand the amount of garments that can be sold in the
United States by allowing companies to borrow from next years quota.
As
the Government of Vietnam itself has recognized, WTO accession is very
important for Vietnam's continued economic growth and development. For
example, when the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing expires on
January 1, 2005, WTO members will no longer be subject to quotas on their
textile exports. However, Vietnam will continue to be subject to quotas
until it accedes to the WTO. This means Vietnamese textile and garment
companies will have to compete with companies in other countries, like
China, that are not constrained by quota.
Of
course, our relationship with Vietnam goes far beyond economic and
commercial questions. One key to advancing our overarching policy
objectives in Vietnam is our assistance programs which we use to promote
civil society development, rule of law, advocacy for persons with
disabilities and those living with HIV/AIDS, environmental management and
trade reform. The BTA results I described earlier already reflect the
impact of the Support For Trade Acceleration Project (known as STAR),
which provides $10.6 million over four years for technical assistance for
BTA implementation.
In
recent months, our assistance program to Vietnam has taken on a new, quite
urgent focus. As you probably know, President Bush designated Vietnam as
one of the fifteen countries that will receive special assistance to
prevent and combat HIV/AIDS, under the Presidents Emergency Program
For AIDS Relief. We will be disbursing some $25 million in Emergency Plan
money in Vietnam in Fiscal Year 2005. For the past 10 days, an interagency
U.S. Government technical team has been here to work with the Vietnamese
to develop a strategy to allocate these new resources effectively. One
area that we are especially interested in is what programs on HIV/AIDS
prevention and education exist at private sector firms, in particular, in
multinationals like many of you represented here tonight. The U.S.
Government team met with AmCham members last week to discuss this, and I
strongly encourage AmCham and its members to do your part to fight the
spread of HIV/AIDS in Vietnam. There are many ways that the AmCham
community both here and in Ho Chi Minh City can become involved. Worker
education, pro bono assistance to develop public service messages and
contributions to care centers near a companys area of operations are
just a few. A key reason why President Bush chose Vietnam as the 15th U.S.
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief country and the only one in Asia is because
there is an excellent, very real chance that the epidemic can be
controlled here with prompt action. If we fail, however, Vietnams
economic gains are likely to erode and its prospects for further economic
growth will fade. Having served in Kenya in the late 1990s, I have seen
first-hand the devastation HIV/AIDS can cause in a vibrant nation. We must
all do whatever we can to prevent that cruel fate from befalling the
Vietnamese people.
Half
of Vietnam's population was born after 1975 and has no recollection of the
war years. The Vietnamese people value education, the capacity for work
and entrepreneurship. With good leadership, Vietnams future can be
very bright, indeed. In addition to its growing importance as a trading
partner, Vietnam has taken on additional responsibilities recently in
regional and international organizations. Clearly, a prosperous and
vibrant Vietnam, one that assumes a leadership role in contributing to
regional stability, is very much in the interest of the United States and
the American people.
The
Government of Vietnam, however, continues to be intolerant of political
dissent and significantly restricts freedom of religion, speech, the
press, assembly and association. It is true that Vietnam is clearly less
repressive now than it was a decade ago, with the Vietnamese people
enjoying more individual freedom and increasing control over their own
lives. Much more is possible, however. We need to demonstrate to the
Vietnamese authorities that expanded personal freedoms and increasing
emphasis on and adherence to the rule of law will set the stage for more
foreign investment and engagement with the United States, and will improve
Vietnams standing in the international community of nations.
To
express its concern with the situation regarding the ability of the people
of Vietnam to exercise their religious beliefs, the United States recently
designated Vietnam as a Country of Particular Concern. While we recognize
that Vietnam has made progress in this area, the plain fact is that a not
insignificant number of Vietnams citizens are not free to worship and
practice as they would like. And, this is something we cannot ignore.
As
I vigorously seek to advance our economic and commercial agenda with
Vietnam, I will also continue to seek tangible progress from Vietnam in
the areas of human rights and religious freedom, areas that must improve
if relations between our two countries are to continue to blossom. In this
connection, I will encourage the Vietnamese Government to look favorably
on foreign direct assistance and development projects that will improve
living conditions in the Central Highlands for all inhabitants, including
Montagnards. I will also maintain a strong stance on respect for the
universal rights of peaceful assembly, freedom of speech and freedom of
religion.
In
my view, prospects are bright for relations between the United States and
Vietnam to continue to deepen and broaden. One key to continued progress
will be patience as we gain confidence in dealing with each other. I look
forward to contributing to the positive growth of this young, but very
promising relationship and to working with all of you to do so.
Thank
you.
Ж
Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж
Copyright
material is distributed without profit or payment for research and
educational purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.
Reference: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|